
By Jerry Bernstein
Cerritos is off the hook. The city is not and has not been a recipient of undue pollution resulting in the city’s air being a Cancer risk caused by “Hydrazine” released from a plant in Santa Fe Springs as stated in a June report issued by the Environmental Protection Agency [EPA}. That was the message given to residents attending the Town Forum Aug. 18 held in the Sierra Room at the Cerritos Center for the Performing Arts.
Hydrazine is a colorless liquid used in rocket fuels and chemical manufacturing and is listed as a possible carcinogen by the EPA.
Representatives from the EPA and South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAQMD] along with Congressional Representatives Linda Sanchez and Grace Napolitano joined members of the City Council in questioning how the repudiated report was released and what steps have been taken to see this does not happen again.
Mayor Bruce Barrows opened the meeting saying it took two months to get information for tonight’s meeting. “It is good to have two members of Congress in your corner,” referring to Grace Napolitano and Linda Sanchez. “Two months is a short time to get a response in government,” he added.
Representative Napolitano said after Cerritos Mayor Bruce Barrows contacted her, she talked to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson who said the report should not have been released since it had not been verified. Napolitano said she and her colleague Representative Linda Sanchez want to guarantee this does not happen again. “The report was a mistake. There was no toxic effect. The report was wrong.”
The Congresswoman said they looked at the different agencies, local and national, that provided the information and questioned how and why it was used. Correct reporting needs to be done,” she asserted. “Your City Council and your mayor put that issue immediately before us. Not only is the city due an apology but the plant that was accused to be the cause of the bogus pollution should receive one as well. The amount of Hydrazine released by the plant was found to be way below the safety level.”
Rep. Sanchez complimented the Mayor and City Council whom she said responded very forcibly and quickly to the EPA air quality report. She said something went very wrong in the analysis of how much Hydrazine was released and we need to know what happened and how it happened. We also need to know what steps are being taken so this will not happen again.
Sanchez said the factors used in future reports have to be checked much more carefully. She was pleased that the Air Quality Management District acted so promptly last month with its plant inspection and testing of Cerritos air quality. She said the AQMD has informed her the data used goes back to 2001 and likely to 1989 or earlier. It looks like the 2001 data was never verified. The Congresswoman concluded by assuring that she and her colleague are going to stay on top of this to its conclusion.
Dr. Phillip Fine, with the SCAQMD, speaking in behalf of all the agencies involved, said
Cerritos air quality was similar to other areas of Southern California. He said the plant inspection was conducted both indoors and outdoors and it was determined the plant was not polluting the atmosphere with toxic materials. He said they measured for the maximum emission rate, which is the worst-case scenario and concluded the plant was operating safely, adding in the future the EPA and SCAQMD are committed to work closely so this type of error will not occur again.
City Consultant Julia Lester, Ph.D. of Environ International Corporation, agreed with Fine. She said the results of Environ’s investigation shows Cerritos air quality is good and is comparable to other urban areas.
EPA Website Results Differ
Upon researching the EPA website she said different data revealed different conclusions. Pointing to a map on a screen in back of the stage, she noted EPA data had had three different location for the plant. One was in a front yard about six miles south of the actual plant site. In 1999 the plant was placed in another location. The 2005 report shows it in its correct location. She said there needs to be a closer relationship with the entire data base before they are used in order to get a correct analysis, adding the SCAQMD concurs.
How did this happen? Dr. Lester answered her own question. “There are a multiple number of databases used by the various agencies which often contradict one another. There needs to be a closer coordination between the agencies and their various databases, she asserted. She also noted that some of the databases have multi uses not related to air quality.
Dr. Lester said they would recommend there be an on going report on air quality and not the current policy of one every seven years. City Councilmember Carol Chen concurred but didn’t understand how a report based on 20-year-old data could be released as current information.
Chen wanted to know if the 2002 report showed a high toxic rate in the atmosphere and if so why wasn’t it double checked to see if it was correct, and if it was high why wasn’t anything done about it? Dr. Fine said the data wouldn’t have shown whether it was healthy or unhealthy. That’s why we need better communication between the agencies, he added.
EPA official Warren Beckman interjected that the 2002 data has been updated. He said all the agencies have agreed they have to coordinate and work closer together so this does not happen again. He said an example of this is tonight’s joint presentation. This has never happened before. “We are now working together to resolve the differences in how we treat carcinogen exhaust in California.”
In a letter to Mayor Barrows, EPA Assistant Administrator Gina McCarthy admitted the 2002 report did not accurately reflect the plant’s emissions of hydrazine. She said it also included incorrect census tract information [location] for the facility. She added the agency would revise the 2002 NATA with correct data.
Councilmember Laura Lee said she feels more has to be done to prevent this from happening again. Referring to the two months it took Cerritos to get the participants of tonight’s Towne Forum together so residents could receive s answers; she said it might have been a short time in government response, but a long time for our residents. How are you going to do your checking in the future so the people don’t have to wait so long for answers? Dr. Fine said they would be doing their checking well in advance to prevent this from happening again.
Left unanswered was why an unverified report was released.